CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE CRISIS PROCESS MONITORING SYSTEM IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Authors

  • Tamara Popovych cand.sc.(econ.), assoc. prof., associate professor at the department of management, public administration, and human resources, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37332/

Keywords:

public administration, crisis, crisis processes, crisis process monitoring, conceptual model, crisis management, monitoring system, crisis process monitoring indicators, proactive management, institutional resilience

Abstract

Popovych T.M. CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE CRISIS PROCESS MONITORING SYSTEM IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Purpose. The aim of the article is to develop conceptual foundations for forming a system for monitoring crisis processes in public administration as an information and analytical framework for the timely identification of crisis trends, forecasting their development, and making proactive managerial decisions. Particular attention is paid to substantiating the need to transition from a reactive crisis management model to a proactive one based on the continuous monitoring of crisis processes.

Methodology of research. The methodological foundation of the study relies on systemic, process, risk-oriented, adaptive, and indicative approaches. A complex of general scientific and special methods was used, in particular, systemic (to consider the monitoring of crisis processes as an integral information and analytical subsystem of public administration with the definition of its interconnected elements, tasks, methods and digital data processing tools), structural and functional analysis (to describe the structure of the proposed monitoring system, the functional purpose of its components, the distribution of functions between different levels of monitoring subjects, as well as the presentation of the analytical procedure for its implementation), logical generalization method (to systematize scientific approaches to the need to monitor crisis processes and generalize the identified problems of its implementation), comparative analysis (to identify differences between traditional (mostly reactive) approaches to monitoring and the proposed proactive model, focused on continuous support of the crisis process throughout its life cycle), the method of scientific modelling (to develop mechanisms for integrating monitoring results into the process of making management decisions), as well as conceptual design (to build an author's model of a crisis process monitoring system).

Findings. The expediency of forming an integrated crisis process monitoring system in public administration is substantiated; its place within the crisis management system is defined, and its functional purpose is revealed. A conceptual model of the system is proposed, encompassing interrelated elements: objects and subjects of monitoring, information sources, principles of functioning, methods, digital tools, analytical procedures, a system of indicators, and mechanisms for utilizing the results. The logic of analytical procedures for monitoring has been developed, and a multidimensional approach to building a system of indicators based on assessing the dynamics, intensity, scale, configuration, interdependence, and resilience of crisis processes is proposed.

Originality. The role of monitoring in the public administration system has been conceptually rethought, in particular, it is proposed to consider it not as an auxiliary tool of observation or control, but as an independent function of public administration, which provides continuous information and analytical support for the development of crisis processes, support for management decision-making, and increasing the institutional stability of the public sector.

Practical value. The proposed concept can be used as a methodological basis for creating modern systems for monitoring crisis processes in state and local government bodies, developing information and analytical platforms to support management decisions, improving interdepartmental coordination mechanisms, increasing the effectiveness of anti-crisis management, and forming adaptive state policy focused on timely detection, forecasting, and prevention of crisis processes.

Key words: public administration, crisis, crisis processes, crisis process monitoring, conceptual model, crisis management, monitoring system, crisis process monitoring indicators, proactive management, institutional resilience.

 

References

1. Belialov, T.E., Bubko, V.H. and Kyrychenko, V.O. (2025), “Risk management and crisis response in the public administration system”, Visnyk Poltavskoho derzhavnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia “Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia”, no. 3, pp. 74-80, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/pdau.pma.2025.3.10

2. Vozovyk, O.O. (2023), “Peculiarities of anti-crisis management in the activities of public administration bodies”, Derzhava ta rehiony, no. 3(81), pp. 85-89, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2023.3.13

3. Zubko, T.L. (2022), “Methods for assessing the economic security of the country”, Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo, no. 2(125), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1814-1161/2022-2-3

4. Karlova, V. (2025), “Use of digital technologies in anti-crisis public administration: opportunities and prospects”, available at: https://eprints.zu.edu.ua/46687/1/1.pdf (access date April 22, 2026).

5. Kravtsova, T., Lashchenko, O. and Kravtsov, O. (2021), “Theoretical foundations of implementing anti-crisis management in the activities of public administration bodies”, Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, Vol. 9, no. 3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/152129

6. Poteriaiko, S.P., Terentieva, A.V., Tverdokhlib, O.S. and Bielikova, K.H. (2023), Kryzovi komunikatsii v umovakh nadzvychainykh sytuatsii [Crisis communications in emergency situations], collective monograph, IDUNDTsZ, Kyiv, Ukraine, 208 p., available at: https://indcz.dsns.gov.ua/ upload/2/4/9/7/1/0/5/monografiia-komunikaciyi-ns-112023.pdf (access date April 23, 2026).

7. Lienkov, O.S. (2023), “Anti-crisis management of territorial communities development: essence and modern mechanisms”, Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity. Seriia “Sotsialni ta povedinkovi nauky”, Iss. 25 (54), DOI: https://doi.org/10.58442/2522-9931-2023-25(54)-150-167

8. Liashevska, O.I. (2023), “Implementation of systemic state anti-crisis management and development of management decisions to improve the mechanisms of public anti-crisis management in Ukraine”, Derzhavne budivnytstvo, Iss. 1(33), pp. 72-83, DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-2337-2023-1-07

9. Martinovych, V. and Rudenko, O. (2020), “Signs of crises emergence in the public administration system”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue no. 22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2020-22-74

10. Medvid, V. (2024), “Monitoring of socio-economic development of territorial communities: theoretical and methodological aspects”, Visnyk Poltavskoho derzhavnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia “Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia”, Issue 2, DOI: 10.32782/pdau.pma.2024.2.7

11. Monastyrskyi, H.L. and Popovych, T.M. (2018), Antykryzove upravlinnia [Anti-crisis management], tutorial, Krok, Ternopil, Ukraine, 180 p.

12. Popovych, T. and Halko, L. (2025), “Anti-crisis monitoring in the crisis management system”, Aktualni problemy menedzhmentu ta publichnoho upravlinnia v umovakh suchasnykh vyklykiv : Materialy dopovidey VI Vseukrayinskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu [Current problems of management and public administration in the conditions of modern challenges: Materials of the reports of the VI All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation], (Zbarazh, May 15, 2025), ZUNU, Ternopil, Ukraine, pp. 222-225, available at: https://conference.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/apmpuvusv/article/view/833 (access date April 24, 2026).

13. Shkilniak, M.M. and Melnyk, A.F. (Eds.) (2025), Publichne upravlinnia v umovakh suspilnykh transformatsii ta suchasnykh vyklykiv [Public administration in the conditions of social transformations and modern challenges], monograph, ZUNU, Ternopil, Ukraine, 442 p.

14. Reznikova, O. (2019), “Conceptual approaches to the development of an early warning system as a mechanism for ensuring national resilience”, Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filosofsko-politolohichni studii, Iss. 23, pp. 196-202, available at: https://fps-visnyk.lnu.lviv.ua/archive/23_2019/31.pdf (access date April 25, 2026).

15. Shkilniak, M.M. and Vasina, A.Yu. (Eds.) (2022), Rozvytok publichnoho upravlinnia ta menedzhmentu v umovakh transformatsiinykh vyklykiv [Development of public administration and management in the conditions of transformational challenges], monograph, ZUNU, Ternopil, Ukraine, 521 p.

16. Syvak, T.V. (2021), “Analysis of methodological approaches to anti-crisis management in the public sphere”, Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, iss. 3 (Spetsvypusk do 20-y richchia ORIDU NADU pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy), pp. 234-241, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 348555583_ANALIZ_METODOLOGICNIH_PIDHODIV_DO_ANTIKRIZOVOGO_UPRAVLINNA_V_PUBLIC (access date April 26, 2026).

17. Sokolov, O.Ye. (2021), “Theoretical and methodological foundations of crisis research in public administration”, Derzhavne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok, Vol. 3, pp. 726-751, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-5984/2021/3.44

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

“CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE CRISIS PROCESS MONITORING SYSTEM IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION”. INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, no. 3, Aug. 2026, pp. 148-59, https://doi.org/10.37332/.