FACTORS SHAPING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF ECOTOURISM DESTINATIONS OF UKRAINE UNDER CONDITIONS OF WAR AND MARTIAL LAW

Authors

  • Serhii Kramar candidate for the third (educational and scientific) level of higher education “Doctor of Philosophy” in specialty 051 Economics, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37332/

Keywords:

investment attractiveness, ecotourism, ecotourism destination, investment project, martial law, protected area, territorial community, sustainable tourism

Abstract

Kramar S.Ya. FACTORS SHAPING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF ECOTOURISM DESTINATIONS OF UKRAINE UNDER CONDITIONS OF WAR AND MARTIAL LAW

Purpose. The aim of the study is to theoretically clarify the content, systematize the factors shaping the investment attractiveness of ecotourism destinations of Ukraine in conditions of war and martial law, as well as test the proposed systematization using the example of implemented ecotourism project initiatives.

Methodology of research. The study employs analysis and synthesis to clarify the conceptual framework; comparison and logical generalization to distinguish between investment attractiveness, tourism attractiveness, and investment potential; systematization to identify and structure the principal groups of factors; and content analysis of open-source materials combined with the case study method to examine four types of ecotourism projects implemented within protected areas in Ukraine.

Finding. An original definition of the investment attractiveness of an ecotourism destination is proposed. The factors shaping investment attractiveness are systematized into natural and environmental, security-related, financial and economic, infrastructural and technological, institutional and managerial, social and human-resource, and reputational groups. A comparative analysis of a large-scale nature conservation project, a national nature park development initiative, a specialized tourism product, and community-based mini-grant projects demonstrates that investment attractiveness is not directly determined by the amount of received funding. Rather, it depends on the coherence between natural value, security, infrastructure, legal and managerial support, the operational model, and the involvement of the local community.

Originality. The systematization of factors of investment attractiveness of ecotourism destinations has been improved by isolating security factors and treating adaptive capacity as a cross-cutting characteristic of their interaction. It has been substantiated that the decisive importance is not the maximum expressiveness of a single advantage, but the absence of critical gaps between the resource, institutional, infrastructure, security and market components of the project.

Practical value. The proposed systematization can be used as an analytical basis for preliminary diagnostics of ecotourism initiatives, identification of critical gaps, and structuring information during the preparation of investment proposals.

Key words: investment attractiveness, ecotourism, ecotourism destination, investment project, martial law, protected area, territorial community, sustainable tourism.

 

References

1. World Bank (2026), Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment released, available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/02/23/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-needs-assessment-released (access date June 20, 2026).

2. UN Tourism (n.d.), Ecotourism and protected areas, available at: https://www.untourism.int/sustainable-development/ecotourism-and-protected-areas (access date June 20, 2026).

3. State Tax Service of Ukraine (2026), “UAH 359 million of tourist tax was transferred to community budgets in 2025”, available at: https://tax.gov.ua/media-tsentr/novini/974725.html (access date June 21, 2026).

4. Zarubina, A., Sira, Ye. and Demchuk, L. (2022), “Features of tourism under martial law”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue no. 41, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-41-14

5. Bordun, O., Shevchuk, V., Monastyrskyi, V. and Luchka, O. (2022), “Losses and directions for saving Ukraine’s tourism business during the war”, Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia ekonomichna, Iss. 62, pp. 178-196, DOI: https://doi.org/10.30970/ves.2022.62.0.6214

6. Barvinok, N. (2022), “Impact of global security factors on the development of international tourism in Ukraine”, Věda a perspektivy, no. 4(11), pp. 139-151, DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2695-1592-2022-4(11)-139-151

7. Motsa, A., Shevchuk, S. and Sereda, N. (2022), “Prospects for post-war recovery of tourism in Ukraine”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue no. 41, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-41-31

8. Krasnokutska, Yu., Seheda, I. and Bezpalova, A. (2023), “Post-war recovery of Ukraine’s tourism industry in the context of sustainable development”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue no. 56, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-56-88

9. Reddy, M.V., Boyd, S.W. and Nica, M. (2020), “Towards a post-conflict tourism recovery framework”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 84, Article 102940, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102940

10. Nikitenko, K.S. (2023), “Development of ecotourism in Ukraine: potential and problems”, Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika, Iss. 15, pp. 259-263, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2023.15.32

11. Tokareva, V. and Horiunova, K. (2025), “Development of ecotourism in Ukraine: the role of recreational complexes in attracting tourists and preserving ecosystems”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue no. 71, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-71-62

12. Hlushchenko, A.V. and Rudomanov, D.S. (2024), “Development of ecotourism in Ukraine”, Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 189, pp. 119-122, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/189-22

13. Zhadko, O.A. (2025), “Tools for sustainable tourism development in protected areas”, Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika, Iss. 26, pp. 339-344, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2025.26.36

14. Maiorova, T.V. (2009), Investytsiina aktyvnist [Investment Activity], textbook, Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, Kyiv, Ukraine, 472 p.

15. Kramar, S.Ya. (2025), “Investment barriers and ways to overcome them in the ecotourism sector of Ukraine”, Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, no. 17, pp. 247-252, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2025.17.247

16. Dudley, N. (Ed.) (2008), Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/pag-021.pdf (access date June 21, 2026).

17. Okhota, V.I. (2026), “Prospects for ecotourism development in the context of post-war recovery of Ukraine”, Yevropeiskyi zhurnal ekonomichnykh ta finansovykh innovatsii, no. 2(20), pp. 529-541, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32750/2026-0244

18. “Support to Nature Protected Areas in Ukraine : official project website”, available at: https://snpa.in.ua/ (access date June 21, 2026).

19. “Verkhovynskyi National Nature Park : official website”, available at: https://verkhovynskyi-park.in.ua/ (access date June 22, 2026).

20. National Ecological Centre of Ukraine (2026), “Project ‘Along the routes of darabs’: revival of timber rafting traditions in Verkhovyna”, available at: https://necu.org.ua/proyekt-shlyahamy-darab-vidrodzhennya-tradyczij-lisosplavu-u-verhovyni/ (access date June 22, 2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

“FACTORS SHAPING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF ECOTOURISM DESTINATIONS OF UKRAINE UNDER CONDITIONS OF WAR AND MARTIAL LAW”. INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, no. 3, Aug. 2026, pp. 129-37, https://doi.org/10.37332/.