MECHANISMS FOR STIMULATING THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE CONDITIONS OF POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION OF UKRAINE

Authors

  • Oleh Yadchyshyn candidate for the third (educational and scientific) level of higher education “Doctor of Philosophy” in specialty 073 “Management”, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37332/

Keywords:

state regulation, territorial communities, circular procurement, reuse, recycling, sustainable development, local resource flows, institutional support

Abstract

Yadchyshyn O.V. MECHANISMS FOR STIMULATING THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE CONDITIONS OF POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION OF UKRAINE

Purpose. The aim of the article is to substantiate the mechanisms for stimulating the circular economy in the conditions of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine, to define their multi-level architecture, and to propose an applied approach to the implementation of circular solutions at the state level, the level of territorial communities, and the level of enterprises.

Methodology of research. A set of general scientific and special methods was used, in particular: methods of analysis and synthesis – to generalize modern scientific approaches to understanding the circular economy and mechanisms for its stimulation; systematization – to structure stimulation mechanisms by levels of implementation and functional purpose; logical and structural method – to build a table for the implementation of circular solutions in the post-war reconstruction system; analytical generalization – to form practical conclusions on the adaptation of relevant mechanisms to Ukrainian conditions.

Findings. The article establishes that in the conditions of post-war reconstruction, the circular economy should be considered not as a narrowly ecological concept, but as an applied mechanism for resource conservation, reducing the material intensity of reconstruction and increasing the economic sustainability of territories. It was found that the key barriers to its development in Ukraine remain the fragmentation of institutional regulation, weak economic incentives, underdevelopment of the recycling infrastructure, insufficient integration of circular requirements into recovery programs, and uneven capacity of territorial communities to manage local resource flows. The feasibility of dividing incentive mechanisms into four interconnected blocks is substantiated: regulatory and economic framework, procurement mechanisms, investment instruments, and local incentives for communities and business. A table for implementing circular economy incentive mechanisms is proposed, within which standardization and financial incentives are prioritized at the state level, inventory of resource flows, circular procurement, and territorial coordination at the community level, and resource-locked business models, material flow audits, and partnerships with local market participants are prioritized at the enterprise level. It is proven that only the coordinated functioning of these levels creates the prerequisites for the transition from fragmented environmental practices to a systemic model of circular recovery.

Originality. The approach to substantiating mechanisms for stimulating the circular economy in the conditions of post-war recovery through a combination of institutional, territorial and entrepreneurial levels of implementation has been further developed. Unlike existing approaches, the proposed approach connects state policy instruments, administrative actions of territorial communities and business decisions of enterprises within a single logic of reconstruction.

Practical value. The proposed provisions can be used in the development of state and regional programs for post-war recovery, the formation of a policy to support resource-efficient production, the improvement of the public procurement system, the planning of local infrastructure for processing and reuse of materials, as well as in the activities of enterprises that integrate circular models into their own business processes.

Key words: state regulation, territorial communities, circular procurement, reuse, recycling, sustainable development, local resource flows, institutional support.

References

1. Nabok, R. (2021), “Mechanisms of state regulation of formation and development of circular economy”, Thesis Diss. Cand. Sc. (Publ. adm.), 25.00.02, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 22 p.

2. Nesterova, K.S., Kurovska, I.A. and Hryshova, R.V. (2021), “Problems and instruments of state organizational and economic support for circular economy development”, Problemy ekonomichnoi teorii, no. 5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202105057.

3. Shchepanskyi, E.V. and Kopanchuk, V.O. (2025), “Institutional and conceptual mechanisms of state regulation in the field of waste management”, Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu tsyvilnoho zakhystu Ukrainy. Seriia “Derzhavne upravlinnia”, Issue 1(22), DOI: https://doi.org/10.52363/2414-58.

4. Kuzoma, V. (2024), “Theoretical and methodological support of state regulation of circular economy models implementation at the micro level”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue no. 66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-25.

5. Kondratiuk, I.V., Kurdenko, O.V. and Strilets, R.O. (2025), “Circular economy as a basis for sustainable development of entrepreneurial environment”, Zdobutky ekonomiky: perspektyvy ta innovatsii, no. 25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18060130.

6. Karas, O. (2025), “Investment attractiveness and risks of implementing innovative circular economy business models”, Socio-Economic Relations in the Digital Society, Vol. 4, no. 58, pp. 20-33, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.4.58.2025.634.

7. Savchenko, V., Kononenko, L. and Karnaushenko, A. (2023), “Circular economy in the conditions of Society 5.0 formation”, Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika, no. 16, pp. 166-174, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2023.16.22.

8. Rasheed, M.Q. and Zhao, Y. (2025), “Exploring the impact of technology related to artificial intelligence, circular economy, and energy intensity on Sustainable Development Goal 13”, Sustainable Development, Vol. 34, Iss. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70274.

9. Mansour, F.R., Emara, S., Bedair, A. and Hamed, M. (2026), “Integration of 10R principles into CIRCLE as an innovative tool for assessing circular economy”, RSC Sustainability, Vol. 4, pp. 417-427, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SU00806A.

10. Nuur, C., Karabag, S.F. and Feldmann, A. (2026), “Circular economy in the extractive frontier: tensions and pathways for transformative change in mining”, The Extractive Industries and Society, Vol. 25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101764.

11. Nahara, M.B. (2021), “Ecosystem and circular economy: immanent interconnection”, Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, no. 22, pp. 37-38, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2021.22.37.

12. Nahara, M. (2024), “Driving forces of circular transformation: experience of European Union countries”, Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii, no. 32, pp. 227-232, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/32.35.

13. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1998), Law of Ukraine “On Waste” dated 05.03.1998 no. 187/98-BP, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/187/98-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (access date February 13, 2026).

14. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2022), Law of Ukraine “On Waste Management” dated 20.06.2022 no. 2320-IX, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2320-20#Text (access date February 13, 2026).

15. Malolitneva, V. (2024), “Circular public procurement as a tool for achieving sustainable development goals”, Economics and Law, Vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 84-94, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2019.02.084.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

“MECHANISMS FOR STIMULATING THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE CONDITIONS OF POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION OF UKRAINE”. INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, no. 2, May 2026, pp. 34-42, https://doi.org/10.37332/.