ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF THE DIGITALIZATION OF LOGISTICS PROCESSES IN GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37332/Keywords:
logistics, logistics process, economic determinants, efficiency, economic development, development, digital transformation, digitalization, digital economyAbstract
Panasyuk V.M., Bobrivets V.V. ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF THE DIGITALIZATION OF LOGISTICS PROCESSES IN GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS
Purpose. The aim of the article is to identify and systematize the economic determinants of the digitization of logistics processes in global supply chains and to substantiate their impact on investment decisions and the effectiveness of logistics activities.
Methodology of research. Structural and logical analysis was applied to build the research framework and develop a conceptual model. Analytical and comparative analysis, deduction, and synthesis were used to generalize approaches to logistics digitalization and systematize digital tools (SCM/ERP integration, WMS, TMS, IoT, tracking and tracing, e-document workflow, data analytics). Classification and structuring methods were employed to identify groups of economic determinants and propose assessment indicators. Tabular and visualization methods were used to present the findings in summary tables and a conceptual scheme.
Findings. The study substantiates that logistics digitalization in global supply chains is an economically driven transformation, and its performance depends on the cost structure of logistics, transaction costs, investment capacity, scale of operations, competitive pressure, institutional and regulatory conditions, and the level of digital infrastructure. The economic effect is primarily achieved through reductions in operational and transaction costs, shorter logistics cycle time, increased transparency and controllability of flows, lower losses from disruptions, and improved service. Sustainable positive outcomes are more likely under comprehensive implementation with data integration, process standardization, and analytics-supported decision-making, whereas fragmented initiatives often fail to deliver the expected payback.
Originality. The study further develops the approach that conceptualizes logistics digitalization as a systemic managerial decision determined by a set of economic factors, and proposes a conceptual model linking economic determinants, the choice of digital tools, mechanisms of economic impact, and performance outcomes in global supply chains.
Practical value. The proposed systematization of determinants and indicators can support firms in substantiating investments in digital logistics solutions, setting transformation priorities, and assessing economic feasibility. The findings may also inform public policy aimed at developing digital infrastructure, standardizing data exchange, and promoting paperless procedures to strengthen supply chain competitiveness and resilience.
Key words: logistics, logistics process, economic determinants, efficiency, economic development, development, digital transformation, digitalization, digital economy.
References
1. Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A. (2021), “A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 32, Iss. 9, pp. 775-788, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450.
2. Bigliardi, B., Filippelli, S., Petroni, A. and Tagliente, L. (2022), “The digitalization of supply chain: a review”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 200, pp. 1806–1815, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.381.
3. Helo, P. and Thai, V.V. (2024), “Logistics 4.0 – digital transformation with smart connected tracking and tracing devices”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 275, 109336, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109336.
4. Queiroz, M.M. and Fosso Wamba, S. (2019), “Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA”, International Journal of Information Management, no. 46, pp. 70–82, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021.
5. Coase, R.H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, Vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 386–405, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
6. Williamson, O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, Free Press, New York, USA, 450 p.
7. Kharun, O. and Hrytsyna, L. (2022), “Impact of digitalization on the development of innovative business models of the logistics sphere”, Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, no. 12, Vol. 3, DOI: 10.31891/2307-5740-2022-312-6(1)-18.
8. Shtelmashuk, M.S. (2024), “Digitalization and automation of logistics processes: current state and prospects”, Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 68, DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2024-68-193.
9. World Trade Organization (2022), Cross-border Paperless Trade Toolkit. 52 p.
10. Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA) (2020), Standard for the Bill of Lading: a roadmap towards eDocumentation, Version 1.0, December, 39 p.
11. Roman, E.A., Stere, A.S., Roșca, E. et al. (2025), “State of the Art of Digital Twins in Improving Supply Chain Resilience”, Logistics, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, DOI: 10.3390/logistics9010022.
12. Ogunsoto, O.V., Olivares-Aguila, J. and ElMaraghy, W. (2025), “A conceptual digital twin framework for supply chain recovery and resilience”, Supply Chain Analytics, no. 9, 100091, DOI: 10.1016/j.sca.2024.100091.
13. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
14. Badakhshan, E. and Ball, P. (2023), “Applying digital twins for inventory and cash management in supply chains under physical and financial disruptions”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 61, no. 15, pp. 5094–5116, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2093682.
15. Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E. and Bahroun, Z. (2019), “Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 57, no. 15–16, pp. 4719–4742, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140.
16. Tukamuhabwa, B.R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J. and Zorzini, M. (2015), “Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53, no. 18, pp. 5592–5623, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934.
17. Kantsedal, N.A., Leha, O.V. and Morozov, Ye.O. (2025), “Digitalization of logistics: new technologies to improve management and optimization”, Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 199, pp. 45–51, DOI: 10.30838/EP.199.45-51.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Open-access articles (open-access journals)
Authors whose articles are published in open-access retain all rights to the content of the articles.
Open access articles are committed to be published under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0. This license allows others to distribute, edit, correct and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they indicate your authorship. Detailed information at Creative Commons site: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Permissions for open-access journals
If the article is published in open-access under CC BY 4.0 or CC BY-NC 4.0 (which was possible till the 15th of December, 2018) licenses, users may reproduce it in accordance with their terms.
Additionally, if the article had been published under CC BY-NC 4.0 (this license authorizes others to download your works and share them with others as long as they indicate your authorship, but they can’t use them commercially in any case.), the use for the following commercial purposes requires permission:
– reproduction of content in a work or product intended for sale;
– reproduction in presentations, brochures or other marketing materials used for commercial purposes;
– distribution of the content to promote or market a person, product, course, service or organization;
– text and data mining for the purpose of creating a saleable product or product which benefits from promotional or advertising revenue;
– use of the content by a commercial entity or individual for the purposes of remuneration, directly or indirectly through sale, licensing, promotion or advertising;
– linking to the content (in an email, webpage, portable electronic device or otherwise) for the specific purpose of marketing or advertising a person, product, course, service or organization for commercial benefit.
For further details and permission requests, please contact.
