INNOVATIVE ASPECT OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT THE CONTEXT OF AGROECOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF UKRAINE
Abstract
Ivanko A.V., Broyaka A.A., Ksenofontov M.M. INNOVATIVE ASPECT OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT THE CONTEXT OF AGROECOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF UKRAINE
Purpose. The aim of the article is to determine the features of the innovative aspect of management of agricultural enterprises, taking into account the agroecological challenges faced by Ukraine.
Methodology of research. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach to the consideration of social and economic phenomena and processes. In the course of the study, other methods were also used, in particular: abstract and logical – to understand the features of the innovative aspect of agricultural enterprise management, taking into account the agroecological challenges faced by Ukraine; generalization – to highlight the list of agroecological challenges, current measures in response to agroecological challenges and innovations that will contribute to the preparation of effective management responses by the management of agricultural enterprises in response to agroecological challenges, the formation of research conclusions, graphical – to visualize the results of the study.
Findings. The importance of using an innovative approach to prepare a response by the management of agricultural enterprises to existing agroecological challenges is emphasized, which is based on the differentiation of innovations by direction, in particular innovations that intensify the economic activity of agricultural enterprises and innovations aimed at optimizing its components, was emphasized. The number of agroecological challenges for agricultural producers was summarized with the allocation of 5 main types: climate change, environmental standardization of agricultural production, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, pollution control and protection of biodiversity, restoration of natural complexes degraded and affected by war. In accordance with the identified agroecological challenges, a list of relevant measures in response to them was determined for such main groups as agrotechnological measures, water resources management and sustainable land use.
Originality. The expediency of distinguishing innovations by direction, in particular, innovations that intensify the economic activity of agricultural enterprises and innovations aimed at optimizing its components, was emphasized.
Practical value. The obtained results of the study are aimed at forming the basis for improving the management of agricultural enterprises, as they structure the process of managerial decision-making.
Key words: agricultural enterprises, innovations, innovative aspect of management, agroecological challenges, response to agroecological challenges, integrated approach.Keywords
Full Text:
References
Heiets, V., Yurchyshyn, V., Borodina, O. and Prokopa, I. (2011), “Socioeconomic modernization of the agrarian sector of Ukraine (conceptual provisions)”, Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 12, pp. 4-14.
Melnyk, S.I., Svynous, I.V., Furman, I.V. et al (2021), “Agricultural investment activity in the conditions of transformation processes”, Ekonomika ta derzhava, no. 11, pp. 14-19.
Levandivskyi, O.T. (2016), “Theoretical basis of investment activity”, Aktualni problemy rozvytku ekonomiky rehionu, Iss. 12 (1), pp. 98-104.
Borodina, O., Kyryziuk, S., Yarovyi, V. et al. (2016), “Modeling local land uses under the global climate change”, Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia, no. 1, pp. 117-128.
Porter, M. (2020), Konkurentna stratehiia. Tekhniky analizu haluzey i konkurentiv [Competitive strategy. Techniques of analysis of industries and competitors], Translated by N. Koshmanenko, Nash Format, Kyiv, Ukraine, 560 p.
The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2012), The Law of Ukraine “On innovative activity” dated 04.07.2002 no. 40-IV, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/40-15#Text (access date October 08, 2024).
Prokopyshyn, L.M. (2008), “Management innovations and features of their use at machine-building enterprises in modern business conditions”, Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”, no. 628, pp. 628-633.
Rykovska, O., Fraier, O. and Mykhailenko, O. (2024), Analiz stanu silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy ta implementatsiia normatyvno-pravovykh aktiv YeS, dotychnykh do ahrarnykh ta dovkillievykh pytan [Analysis of the state of agriculture in Ukraine and the implementation of EU regulations related to agrarian and environmental issues], editors M. Bielkina, A. Danyliak, HO “Ekodiia”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 22 p.
Sava, A., Sydoruk, B. and Voloshyn, R. (2019), “Management of rural territories land resources in decentralization conditions”, Ekonomichnyi dyskurs, Iss. 1(3), pp. 24-36.
Samuelson, P. (1993), Ekonomika [Economics], Translated by English; O. Lishchyshyn (ed.), Svit, Lviv, Ukraine, 495 p.
Sydoruk, B.O. and Dovhan, O.M. (2016), “Features of the assessment of the use of natural resource potential of the agrosphere at the regional level”, Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Podilskoho derzhavnoho ahrarno-tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, Iss. 24, Part 3, pp. 201-210.
Schumpeter, J.A. (2011), Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku: Doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [The theory of economic development: a study of profits, capital, credit, interest, and the economic cycle], Vyd-vo NaUKMA, Kyiv, Ukraine, 244 p.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2006 - 2025