ONTOLOGICAL PREREQUISITES OF INNOVATIVE MODERNIZATION OF THE ECONOMY
Abstract
Oleksiuk V.O. ONTOLOGICAL PREREQUISITES OF INNOVATIVE MODERNIZATION OF THE ECONOMY
Purpose. The aim of the article is to generalize the ontological prerequisites and peculiarities of institutional support for modernization of the economy.
Methodology of research. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach to identifying ontological features and elements of institutional support for modernization transformations. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach to identifying the ontological features of the modernization of the economy, an institutional-evolutionary approach to the study of the elements of institutional support of modernization transformations, a graphic analysis – to reflect the dynamics of the parameters of the innovation index.
Findings. It is emphasized that the specific realities of the transitional state of the social and economic system became the ontological foundation of the modernization changes of the national economy. It was established that at this evolutionary stage, effective institutions and innovations, which in their totality form the basis for the modernization of the social and economic system, are of key importance for the national economy.
It is argued that modernization ensures economic and social changes and realizes the progressive transition of the social and economic model to a new stage of development. At the current stage of development, such a vector is the post-industrial model, which is based on a more advanced technological method of social production, expansion of the sphere of services, information and knowledge. Implementation of the modernization process requires optimization of regulatory influences and interaction of driving forces of transformational transformations (state, society, market).
Originality. It is substantiated that regulatory institutional influences on modernization dynamics in the national economy should take into account global transformational factors: the growing role of information and communication technologies; spread of economic integration, expansion of transnational corporations, liberalization of trade relations; orientation of national economies to foreign relations, interpenetration and mutual influence of macroeconomic policies, internationalization of education and culture.
In view of the task of modernization transformations, the adoption of measures to activate innovative activity through the substantiation and implementation of state support tools, the material and technical support of scientific structures with modern tools and equipment for scientific research, the formation of financial motivation for the productive work of researchers and the implementation of European norms and standards are argued organization and funding of fundamental research.
Practical value. The theoretical and methodological provisions of this study deepen the practical toolkit of institutional regulation of the modernization of the national economy.
Key words: modernization, innovation, national economy, development, transformation, institutional support, institute.
Keywords
References
Hrazhevska, N.I. (2008), Ekonomichni systemy epokhy hlobalnykh zmin [The economic system of the era of global change], Znannia, Kyiv, Ukraine, 431 p.
Zabarna, E.M. (Ed.) et al. (2019), Paradyhma innovatsiinoho rozvytku v umovakh rynkovoyi transformaysii [The paradigm of innovative development in the conditions of market transformation], monograph, OLDI-PLIUS, Kherson, Ukraine, 92 p.
Pysarenko, T.V., Kuranda, T.K., Kvasha, T.K. et al. (2021), Stan naukovo-innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini u 2020 rotsi: naukovo-analitychna zapyska [State scientifically innovative to activity in Ukraine in 2020 year: scientifically analytical message], UkrINTEI, Kyiv, Ukraine, 39 p.
Tarasevych, V.N. (2008), “On the synergy of innovation”, Biuleten mizharodnoho nobelivskoho ekonomichnoho forumu, no.1, pp. 224-232.
Fedulova, L.I. (2020), “Innovative development of the economy of Ukraine: problems and prospects”, Ekonomichnyi visnyk universytetu, no. 44, pp. 42-49.
Chukhno, A.A. (2003), Postindustrialna ekonomika: teoriia, praktyka ta yikh znachennia dlia Ukrainy [Post-industrial economy: theory, practice and their significance for Ukraine], LOHOS, Kyiv, Ukraine, 617 p.
Schumpeter, Y.A. (2011), Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku. Doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [Theory of economic development. Research of profits, capital, credit, interest and economic cycle lane], Vyd. dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska Akademiia”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 242 p.
Denzau, A. and North, D. (1994), “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions?”, Kyklos, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3-31.
The World Bank (2021), “Medium and high-tech Industry (including construction) (% manufacturing value added)”, available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series= NV.MNF.TECH.ZS.UN&country=# (access date November 20, 2022).
Khalatur, S., Honcharenko, O., Karamushka, O., Solodovnykova, I. and Shramko, I. (2022), “Paradigm transformation of the economic crises modeling”, Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, no. 4(45), pp. 285-297. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3833
Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018, available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf (access date November 20, 2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2022.4.4
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2006 - 2024