RETHINKING APPROACHES TO BUILDING A HARMONIOUS FOOD MARKET AND MODELLING ITS DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
Hlubish L.Ya. RETHINKING APPROACHES TO BUILDING A HARMONIOUS FOOD MARKET AND MODELLING ITS DEVELOPMENT
Purpose. The aim of the article is to identify the possibility of exploring the process of tripartite market interaction of the multiple food provision sphere stakeholders as a holistic unity through the formalization of dynamic change, describing their properties with taking into account the time factor in mind.
Methodology of research. The advantages of the triadic logic of conducting scientific research aimed at harmonizing the interaction of multiply stakeholders in the food provision sphere above the dyad are established using of the comparison method. The need to build a harmonious food market requires the synthesis of traditional techniques with new knowledge.
The use of synthesis, the essence of which is the imaginary unification of individual parts of the object of scientific research into a single whole, due also to the fact that the scope of food security is a coherent unity. Given the need to visualize the objects of scientific search, modelling has a special role in the process of scientific knowledge of the nature of economic phenomena and processes, as well as finding out the causes of appearance of the problematic moments, it is the modelling itself.
Findings. The complexity and multidimensionality of tripartite interaction of the food provision requires a rethinking of traditional approaches to building semi-structured, open systems. As a result of comparative analysis, the need to move from dialectic to conducting a study of harmonization of market interaction in the field of food provision sphere on the basis of trialectics is proved.
The continuation of the trialectic logic is the use of synthesis, which made it possible to realize that the interaction of the absolute opposite forms a triune space, which should be regarded as a harmoniously developing integrity. The use of simulation modelling made it possible to visualize the synthetic interaction of the stakeholders of the triad of subject and functional components of the food provision sphere.
Originality is to combine vector algebra with spatial geometry, which made it possible to visualize dynamic market interaction in the food provision sphere as in a systematic triad with taking into account the time factor in mind.
Practical value. The triple helix as an institutional matrix for the harmonization of the stakeholders' market interaction of the triad of subject and functional components of the domestic food provision sphere in the whole of production, consumer and regulatory aspects should ensure its synergistic stability in the context of globalization of food markets.
Key words: food provision sphere; marketing strategy; stakeholder; motion vector; systematic Triad; trilateral market interaction; balancing economic interests; harmonious food market; triune space; moral economy; triple helix model; synergy; disproportions; dyadic paradigm; trialectics.Keywords
Full Text:
References
Katukov, D. (2013), “Network interactions in an innovative economy: The triple helix model”, Vestnik instituta ekonomiki Rosiyskoy akademii nauk, no. 2, pp. 112–121.
Prokhorov, A.M. (Ed.) (1985), Sovietskii entsiklopiedichieskii slovar [Soviet encyclopedic dictionary], 3-d edition, Sov. Entsiklopiediya, Moscow, Russia, 1600 p.
Tikhonov, A.A. (2008), Viektornaia algiebra – iazyk sovriemiennoi miekhaniki [Vector algebra – the language of modern mechanics], textbook, GOUVPO, SPbGTURP, St. Petersburg, Russia, 30 p.
Zadorozhnyi, G.V., and Zadorozhnaya, O.G. (2017), Trialiektika kak mietodologiia istinnogo khoziaistviennogo postizheniia riealnosti i chielovieka [Trialelectics as a methodology of true economic comprehension of reality and man] / (prieprint nauchnogo doklada na Kharkovskom Karazinskom miezhdistsyplinarnom mietodologichieskom sieminarie), KNU im. V.N. Karazina, Kharkov, Ukraine, 32 p.
Smorodinskaya, N. (2011), “The triple helix as a new matrix of the economic systems”, Innovatsii, no. 4 (150), pp. 66–78.
Shyian, A.A. (2009), Teoriia ihor: osnovy ta zastosuvannia v ekonomitsi ta menedzhmenti [Game theory: fundamentals and applications in economics and management], textbook, VNTU, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, 164 p.
Stryzhak, E.O. (2013), “The scientific method of economic theory: from dialectic to trialectic”, Biznessinform, no. 10, pp. 8–13.
Vasylenko, S.L. and Serhyenko, P.Ya. (2010), Matiematika i garmoniia tselostnosti. K Í-mu mezhdunarodnomu kongressu po matematicheskim problemam garmonii [Mathematics and harmony of integrity], To the 1st international congress on mathematical problems of harmony”, available at: http://314159.ru/vasilenko/vasilenko2.htm. (access date January 18, 2020).
Kharitonov, A.S. “The gold triple helix of complex systems development”, available at: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0232/013a/2022-hrt.pdf. (access date January 15, 2020).
Itskovits, G. (2011), “The triple helix model”, Innovatsii, no. 4 (150), pp. 5–10.
Antonovich, Ye.N. (2014), “Genesis and levels of cognition of the structure of the triad in philosophy”, Teritiriya novykh vozmozhnostiey. Viestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstviennogo univiersitieta ekonomiki i servisa, no.1, pp. 80–99.
Bushuyev, V.V., Golubiev, V.S. and Krutko V.N. (2014), “Trialectic of development and the sociohumanism”, Strategicheskiye prioritety, no. 3, pp. 63–75.
Adorno, T.V. (2011), Niegativnaia dialiektika [Negative dialectic], Zurkamp, Moscow, Russia, 416 p.
Vasilenko, S.L. and Nikitin, A.V. “From dialectic to poli(a)lectic and back to … future”, available at: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0226/002a/1102-vsnik.pdf. (access date January 18, 2020).
Popper, K. “The dialectic – what is it”, available at: http://philosophy.ru/library/vopros/50.html. (access date January 19, 2020).
Golubiev, V.S. (2014), “The trialectic of history”, Istoriya i sovremennost, no. 2, pp. 3–16.
Hehel, Heorh Vyliam Fridrikh (1970), Nauka logiki [Science of logic], vol. 1. Mysl, Moscow, Russia, 501 p.
Golubiev, V.S. (2014), “The structural energy and the geopolitics”, Energeticheskaya politika, no. 5, pp. 37–44.
Titarenko, M.L. (ed.) (1989), Istoriia kitaiskoi philosopfii [The history of chinese philosophy] / translate V. S. Taskin, Progress, Moscow, Russia, 552 p.
Ostrovskaya, Ye.P. (2009), “The trialectic as a thinking method”, Voprosy kulturologii, no. 2, pp. 85–86.
Volgin, L.I. “From dialectic through the science cognition to trialectic”, available at: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0016/001a/00160038.htm. (access date January 18, 2020).
Melnyk, L.G. (2014), “The foundations of trialectical approach to the analyzing of self-organization of economic systems”, Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky, no 2, pp. 9–21.
Zadorozhna, O.G. (2018), “From the economy to enterprise: the main methodological principles of the anti-crisis paradigm transition to the format of post-classical economic science”, Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky, no. 22, pp. 11–16.
Golubiev, V.S. (2017), “The harmony will save the world”, Stratehicheskie prioritety, no.1 (13), pp. 106–110.
Knyshenko, T. (2012), “The analysis of structural macroeconomic indicators on the basis harmony principles”, Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava, no. 1 (6), pp. 66–73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2020.1-2.5
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2006 - 2024