THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF AUDIT IS A REQUIREMENT OF TIME
Abstract
Pushkar M.S. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF AUDIT IS A REQUIREMENT OF TIME
Purpose. The aim of the article is to form a modern theoretical model (system) of auditing to improve the practical work of auditors.
Methodology of research. The content of the article is based on the use of such a scientific apparatus as the historical method (when studying the process of the history of the emergence of audit needs), the monographic method and the method of historical development (based on the analysis of the formation of the modern theoretical audit model, the dialectic of changes in the audit environment and its formation on the basis of a set of philosophical , sociological, systemic, psychological and other approaches and methods of cognition), system and analytic – when processing the received information.
Findings. The evolution of audit development is analysed depending on the accounting needs and production processes of the enterprise. It has been proven that an audit is a set of various empirical rules and procedures for the verification and assessment of the level of compliance of indicators of the desired and actual state of the object, for which individual persons are responsible. It was revealed that in connection with the changes in the accounting system, the conceptual basis of the audit should be clarified in terms of the theoretical base, organizational structure, and methodology of the study of the economic activity of the enterprise.
Originality. The author substantiated the audit model, which can influence practical activity and determine its usefulness for business, which involves revealing the essence of audit, structure and axiology (values) for the economy of the country and enterprises.
Practical value. The author’s proposals can be used as a methodical guideline for the implementation of the idea of practical use of audit in the organization of the internal control structure, which would guarantee the effective work of the company’s personnel at all stages of the technological process of production and its management.
Key words: business, system, accounting, audit, model, auditor, paradigm.Keywords
Full Text:
References
Hegel, G.W.F. (1999), Sistema nauk [The system of sciences], Nauka, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 444 p.
Popper, K. (2005), Logika nauchnogo issledovaniia [The logic of scientific research], Translated by V.N. Sadovskiy (Ed.), Respublika, Moscow, Russia, 447 p.
Feyerabend, K. (2007), Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhicheskoy teorii poznaniia [Against the method. Essay on the anarchist theory of knowledge], Translated by A.L. Nikiforov, Khranitel, Moscow, Russia, 413 p.
Kuhn, T.S. (2009), Struktura nauchnykh revoliutsiy [The structure of scientific revolutions], Translated by I.Z. Naletov, AST, Moscow, Russia, 310 p.
Bertalanffy, L. (1969), “General systems theory – a review of problems and results”, Sistemnye issledovaniia, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 30-54.
Zahorodnii, A.H. and Koriahin, M.V. (2004), Audyt: teoriia i praktyka [Audit: theory and practice], Vyd. “Lvivska politekhnika”, Lviv, Ukraine, 456 p.
Kuzhelnyi, M.V. (2006), “Audit theory”, Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, no. 15, pp. 44-51.
Davydov, H.M. (2006), Audyt: teoriia i praktyka [Audit: theory and practice], monograph, Imeks- LTD, Kirovohrad, Ukraine, 326 p.
Mironova, O.A. and Azarskaia, M.A. (2007), Audit: teoriia i metodologiia [Audit: theory and methodology], Omega, Moscow, Russia, 176 p.
Redko, O.Yu. (2011), Audit v posttotalitarnom obshchestve. Filosofskiy aspekt [Audit in a post-totalitarian society. Philosophical aspect], NTsUA, Kyiv, Ukraine, 226 p.
Sokolov, Ya.V. and Terekhov, A.A. (2004), Ocherki razvitiia audita [Essays on the development of audit], ID FBK, Moscow, Russia, 376 p.
Furman, A.V. (2018), “Methodological concept of Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm as a framework condition of collective cognitive creativity”, Vitakulturna metodolohiia: antolohiia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana [Vitakulturna methodology: anthology. To the 25th anniversary of the scientific school of Professor A.V. Furman], coll. monograph, TNEU, Ternopil, Ukraine, 980 p.
Audit Chamber of Ukraine (2018), Mizhnarodni standarty kontroliu yakosti, audytu, ohliadu, inshoho nadannia vpevnenosti ta suputnikh posluh (ostannie vydannia 2016 – 2017 rokiv) [The International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements (2016-2017)], Kyiv, Ukraine, available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/2018-0 (access date February 15, 2022).
Defliz, F.L., Dzhenik, G.R., O’Reyli, V.M. and Khirsh, M.B. (1997), Audit Montgomeri [Audit Montgomery], Translated by Ya.V. Sokolov, YUNITI, Moscow, Russia, 542 p.
Pushkar, M.S. (Ed.) (2012), Problemy i perspektyvy rozvytku audytu v Ukraini [Problems and prospects of audit development in Ukraine], monograph, Kart-blansh, Ternopil, Ukraine, 220 p.
Arens, A. (2003), Audit [Audit], Translated by Ya.V. Sokolov, Finansy i statistika, Moscow, Russia, 560 p.
Robertson, Dzh. (1993), Audit [Audit], KRMG, Auditorskaia firma “Kontakt”, Moscow, Russia, 496 p.
Adams, R. (1995), Osnovy audita [Fundamentals of audit], Translated by Ya.V. Sokolov, Audit, YUNITI, Moscow, Russia, 398 p.
Sheremet, A.D. (2006), “Reforming accounting and auditing in accordance with international standards”, Auditorskie vedomosti, no. 8, pp. 4-12.
Baranov, P.P. (2012), “Threat of loss of the institutional status of audit activity in the conditions of stagnation of the theory of audit”, Bukhgalterskiy uchet, audit i statistika, no. 6, pp.144-149.
Pushkar, M.S. (2011), Teoriia piznannia u rozvytku nauky pro kontrol [Theory of cognition in the development of the science of control], monograph, Kart-blansh, Ternopil, Ukraine, 140 p.
Arabian, K.K. (2019), “Audit theory and conceptual foundations for the development of auditing”, Uchet, analiz i audit, no.6(1), pp. 28-39.
Velsh, V. (2004), Nash postmodernyi modern [Our postmodern modernism], Alterpres, Kyiv, Ukraine, 328 p.
Malkova, T.M. (1998), “Historical analysis of accounting methodology”, Thesis abstract for Dr. Sc. (Econ.), 08.00.12, St. Petersburg, Russia, 305 p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2022.1.14
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2006 - 2024