CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF FORMATION OF VILLAGE-PRESERVING MODEL OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF SOCIALIZATION OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Abstract
Diuk A.A. CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF FORMATION OF VILLAGE-PRESERVING MODEL OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF SOCIALIZATION OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Purpose. The aim of the article is deepening of theoretical and methodical bases of formation of village-preserving model of managing on the bases of socialization of entrepreneurship with the definition of the special significance of social entrepreneurial formations.
Methodology of research. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are the key provisions, principles and methods of modern business theory, social aspects of management and the concept of sustainable development of social economic systems, including the socialization of entrepreneurial activity with the peculiarities of agriculture. The results of the study are based on the use of such methods and approaches as: abstract and logical analysis – to determine the principles of socialization of entrepreneurial management, taking into account the theoretical foundations of the role of enterprises in the rural development system; generalization and systematization – with the conceptual substantiation of the advantages of the village-preserving model of management, as well as the characterization of the role of socialization of agricultural entrepreneurship for the activation of the functions of village-saving; systematic approach – to substantiate the scientific vision of the relationship between the principles of formation of a village-preserving model of management due to the factor of socialization of entrepreneurship with the UN Sustainable Development Goals until 2030.
Findings. Theoretical provisions of the formation of the system of management in the countryside in terms of conceptual positioning of the essence of the village-preserving model on the basis of socialization of entrepreneurship are revealed. The theoretical and methodological characteristics of the unity of economic and social principles in ensuring the criteria of rural conservation on the basis of sustainability are determined.
The methodical estimation of factors of maintenance of functioning of the modern agricultural enterprises with a projection on conditions of achievement of village-preserving social effect for development of territories is carried out. The general priorities of the state policy necessary for achievement which will promote realization of village-preserving model of managing, socialization of business with a projection on sustainable development are characterized.
Originality. The conceptual aspects and principles of forming a village-preserving model of management, based on the socialization of entrepreneurship, are further developed.
Practical value. The results of the conducted study can be the basis for further research on the development of strategy and substantiated of the principles of public policy in the field of sustainable development of villages, rural areas and the development of incentives to strengthen the social orientation of entrepreneurship.
Key words: entrepreneurship, management, village, rural territories, village-preserving model, socialization, sustainable development.
Keywords
Full Text:
References
Smit, Adam (2018), Doslidzhennia pro pryrodu i prychyny bahatstva narodiv [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations], Kyiv, Ukraine, 736 p.
Shumpeter, J.A. (2011), Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku: doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [Theory of economic development: the study of profits, capital, credit, interest and the economic cycle], Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine, 242 p.
Veblen, Torstein (2007), Teoryia delovoho predpryiatyia [Business Enterprise Theory], Delo, Moscow, Russia, 288 p.
Veber, Maks (2012), Hospodarstvo i suspilstvo: narysy sotsiolohii rozuminnia [Economy and society: essays on the sociology of understanding], Kyiv, Ukraine, 1112 p.
Norberh, Yu. (2019), Prohres. Desiat prychyn z neterpinniam chekaty na maibutnie [Progress. Ten reasons to look forward to the future], Kyiv, Ukraine, 188 p.
Medouz, Donella, Randers, Yorhen & Medouz, Dennis (2018), Mezhi zrostannia. 30 rokiv potomu [Growth limits. 30 years later]. Kyiv, Ukraine, 464 p.
Sabluk, P.T. (2011), Orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichna modernizatsiya ahrarnoyi sfery [Organizational and economic modernization of the agricultural sector], NNTs IAE, Kyiv, Ukraine, 342 p.
Lupenko, Yu.O., Malik, M.Y. & Bulavka, O.H. (2020), Stratehichni napriamy staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii na period do 2030 roku [Strategic directions of sustainable development of rural areas for the period up to 2030], NNTs IAE, Kyiv, Ukraine, 60 p.
Malik, M.Y. (1995), Motyvatsiia vyrobnychoi diialnosti v ahrarnii sferi ekonomiky. Metodolohiia i orhanizatsiia [Motivation of production activities in the agricultural sector of the economy. Methodology and organization], NNTs IAE, Kyiv, Ukraine, 177 p.
Zhuk, V.M. (2017), Obih zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia za selozberihaiuchoiu modelliu ahrarnoho ustroiu Ukrainy [Circulation of agricultural lands according to the village-preserving model of the agrarian system of Ukraine], NNTs IAE, Kyiv, Ukraine, 128 p.
Shpykuliak, O.H. and Malik, M.Y. (2019), “Institutional analysis of business development in the agricultural sector of the economy: methodological aspect”, Ekonomika APK, no.6, p. 73-82.
Sava, A.P., Saienko, M.H., Oliinyk, O.R. et al. (2015), Naukovo-praktychni rekomendatsii z obgruntuvannia metodychnykh pidkhodiv shchodo efektyvnoi restrukturyzatsii ahrarnoi haluzi v umovakh staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii [Scientific and practical recommendations for substantiation of methodological approaches to effective restructuring of the agricultural sector in terms of sustainable development of rural areas], Ternopil, Ukraine, 80 p.
Romanova, L.V. (1997), Stanovlennia pidpryiemnytstva v silskomu hospodarstvi [Formation of entrepreneurship in agriculture], NNTs IAE, Kyiv, Ukraine, 272 p.
Sirenko, N.M. and Lunkina, T.I. (2016), “Social entrepreneurship in Ukraine: main aspects”, Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky, no. 1, pp. 5–10.
Yunus, M. (2019), Mir trekh nuley. Kak spravit’sya s nishchetoy, bezrabotitsey i zagryazneniyem okruzhayushchey sredy [The world of three zeros. How to cope with poverty, unemployment and pollution], Moscow, Russia, 275 p.
Paton, B. (2016), Natsionalna paradyhma staloho rozvytku Ukrainy [National paradigm of sustainable development of Ukraine], DU “Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannia ta staloho rozvytku NAN Ukrainy”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 72 p.
Shpykuliak, O. and Bilokinna, I. (2019), “Green” cooperatives in the formation of an institutional mechanism of development of alternative power engineering in the agrarian sector of the economy”, Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Volume 5, Number 2, pp. 249-255. DOI : https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-2-249-255
Malik, M.Y., Shpykuliak, O.H. and Mamchur, V.A. (2020), “Realization of the goals of sustainable development of Ukraine in the context of transformation of personal peasant farms into family farms”, Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannia i stalyi rozvytok, no. 7 (26), pp. 21-31.
Petrukha, S. and Stakhov, B. (2020), “Current challenges to sustainable development of the agrarian sector of Ukraine economy: theoretical-conceptual aspects”, Agrosvit, vol. 8, pp. 49–71. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2020.8.49
Nehoda, Yu. (2020), “Conceptual aspects of agrarian economy sector transformation strategy”, Ekonomika ta derzhava, vol. 2, pp. 39–43. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6806.2020.2.39
President of Ukraine (2019), The Decree “On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine until 2030”, available at: https://www.presi&dent.gov.ua/documents/7222019&29825 (access date 27, April 2020).
Lupenko, Yu.O., Malik, M.I. & Zaiats, V.M. (2016), Rozvytok pidpryiemnytstva i kooperatsii: instytutsionalnyi aspekt [Development of entrepreneurship and cooperation: the institutional aspect], NNTs “IAE”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 430 p.
Shpykuliak, O.H., Lupenko, Yu.O. and Malik, M.Y. (2017), “Theoretical principles of business development in the institutional mechanism of the market”, Rozvytok malykh ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv v rynkovomu instytutsiinomu seredovyshchi: indykatory ta efektyvnist, NNTs “IAE”, pp. 8–12.
Shpykuliak, O.H. (2006), “Dynamics of social capital formation in the countryside”, Ekonomika APK, no. 6, p. 140-148.
Shpykuliak, O.H. (2007), “Formation of social capital in the agrarian sphere of transformation economy”, Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Vol. 8, pp. 28–34, available at: http://mts.asu.lt/mtsrbid/article/view/678/704 (access date February 10, 2020).
Ukraina 2030: Doktryna zbalansovanoho rozvytku [Ukraine 2030: The Doctrine of Balanced Development], Kalvariia, Lviv, Ukraine, 164 p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2020.3-4.13
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2006 - 2024