FORMATION OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BASED ON CLIMATE NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES (CASE STUDY OF IMC AGROHOLDING)

Authors

  • Oleksandr Faichuk cand.sc.(econ.), assoc. prof., associate professor at the department of administrative management and foreign economic activity, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Stepan Hryniuk candidate for the third (educational and scientific) level of higher education in the specialty “Agrarian Management”, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37332/

Keywords:

development strategy, climate neutrality, PESTEL, SWOT, TOWS, McKinsey/GE, Smart Green Strategy, decarbonization, CBAM, agroholding

Abstract

Faichuk O.M., Hryniuk S.V.  FORMATION OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BASED ON CLIMATE NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES (CASE STUDY OF IMC AGROHOLDING)

Purpose. The aim of the article is to theoretically substantiate and development of a conceptual approach to the formation of agricultural enterprise development strategy based on climate neutrality principles using a complex of strategic analysis tools (PESTEL, SWOT, TOWS, McKinsey/GE) on the example of IMC agroholding.

Methodology of research. The methodological basis is the concept of sustainable development and Triple Bottom Line. Methods applied: PESTEL analysis (22 factors) for macro-environment assessment; SWOT analysis of internal potential and external opportunities; TOWS matrix for generating strategic alternatives; McKinsey/GE matrix for investment prioritization.

Findings. Three types of development strategies have been identified for climate neutrality: technological modernization (precision farming), energy transformation (decarbonization), market diversification (carbon credits, ISCC). Using PESTEL analysis, a moderately favorable impact of the external environment (3.34 out of 5.00) was identified, with the most important positive factors being the European integration of Ukraine (0.60), the availability of green finance (0.50) and precision farming technologies (0.40). SWOT analysis confirmed the presence of the company's internal potential: land bank of 116 thousand hectares, EBITDA margin >40%, 100% precision farming coverage. TOWS matrix formed 11 strategic initiatives by combining strengths/weaknesses with opportunities/threats. Using the McKinsey/GE matrix, the concentration of investments in precision agriculture (4.7×4.5) and decarbonization (4.5×4.2), which are positioned in the Invest/Grow zone, was substantiated.

Originality. For the first time, an integrated approach to agricultural enterprise development strategy formation was developed, combining classical strategic analysis tools with climate parameters under CBAM conditions, which, unlike existing approaches, ensures synergy of economic and environmental goals.

Practical value. The methodological toolkit can be used by agricultural enterprises of various scales to form climate-oriented strategies. IMC's Smart Green Strategy experience demonstrates the possibility of combining EBITDA growth >40% with production decarbonization.

Key words: development strategy, climate neutrality, PESTEL, SWOT, TOWS, McKinsey/GE, Smart Green Strategy, decarbonization, CBAM, agroholding.

 

References

1. IPCC (2023), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Geneva, Switzerland, 184 p.

2. FAO (2023), The State of Food and Agriculture 2023, Rome, Italy, 236 p.

3. European Commission (2019), Communication from the Commission. The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final, Brussels, Belgium, 27 p.

4. European Commission (2020), Communication from the Commission. A Farm to Fork Strategy. COM(2020) 381 final, Brussels, Belgium, 23 p.

5. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2021), Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On the National Economic Strategy for the period until 2030” dated 03.03.2021 No. 179, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021 (access date September 10, 2025).

6. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2019), Law of Ukraine “On the Basic Principles (Strategy) of State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the period up to 2030”, dated 28.02.2019 No. 2697-VIII, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19 (access date September 10, 2025).

7. European Parliament and Council (2023), “Regulation (EU) 2023/956 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism”, Official Journal of the European Union, L 130, pp. 52–104.

8. Ansoff, H.I. (1965), Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 241 p.

9. Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York, USA, 396 p.

10. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998), Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management, Free Press, New York, USA, 416 p.

11. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 79–91.

12. Elkington, J. (1997), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford, United Kingdom, 410 p.

13. Lupenko, Yu.O. (2012), Stratehichni napriamy rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy [Strategic directions of agricultural development of Ukraine], NNTs “IAE”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 182 p.

14. Lupenko, Yu.O. and Kropyvko, M.F. (2013), “Agroholdings in Ukraine”, Ekonomika APK, no. 7, pp. 5–21.

15. Sabluk, P.T. (2019), “Agrarian reform in Ukraine”, Ekonomika APK, no. 1, pp. 6–18.

16. Malik, M.Y. (2005), Kadrovyi potentsial ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv [Human resources potential of agricultural enterprises], NNTs “IAE”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 370 p.

17. Kyrylenko, I.H. (2021), “Structural changes in agricultural sector”, Ekonomika APK, no. 12, pp. 6–17.

18. Danylyshyn, B.M. (2022), “Greening the economy as a strategic direction for ensuring sustainable development”, Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 4, pp. 3–19.

19. Melnyk, L.H. (2018), “Zelena” ekonomika [“Green” economy], Universytetska knyha, Sumy, Ukraine, 463 p.

20. Zinchuk, T.O. (2008), Yevropeiska intehratsiia: problemy adaptatsii ahrarnoho sektora [European integration: problems of adaptation of agricultural sector], monograph, DVNZ “Derzhavnyi ahroekolohichnyi universytet”, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 384 p.

21. Khodakivska, O.V. (2015), Ekolohizatsiia ahrarnoho vyrobnytstva [Greening of agricultural production], monograph, NNTs “IAE”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 350 p.

22. OECD (2023), Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2023: Ukraine, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 128 p.

23. World Bank (2022), Ukraine: Agricultural Competitiveness and Growth Project, World Bank, Washington, USA, 98 p.

24. EBRD (2020), Green Economy Transition Approach 2021-2025, EBRD, London, United Kingdom, 52 p.

25. IMC S.A. (2025), Annual Report 2024, Warsaw Stock Exchange, 86 p.

26. AgroTimes (2025), IMK u 2024 rotsi otrymav chystyi prybutok $54,5 mln [IMC received net profit of $54.5 million in 2024], available at: https://agrotimes.ua/agromarket/imk-u-2024-roczi-otrymav-chystyj-prybutok-545-mln/ (access date September 10, 2025).

27. IMC S.A. (2023), Smart Green Strategy 2023-2033. EBRD documentation. 42 p.

28. IMC (2025), V IMK zavershyly zhnyva soniashnyku z rekordnoiu oliinistiu [IMC completed sunflower harvest with record oil content], available at: https://imcagro.com.ua/news (access date October 10, 2025).

Published

2025-12-26

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

“FORMATION OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BASED ON CLIMATE NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES (CASE STUDY OF IMC AGROHOLDING)”. INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 103-10, https://doi.org/10.37332/.