SOCIAL PROJECTS AS A TOOL OF INNOVATIVE SOCIAL POLICY: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND NATIONAL CONTEXT

Authors

  • Lidiia Shynkaruk dr.sc.(econ.), prof., professor at the department of production and investment management, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
  • Emiliia Prushkivska dr.sc.(econ.), prof., professor at the department of production and investment management, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
  • Liudmyla Bondarenko dr.sc.(econ.), assoc. prof., professor at the department of tourism and business economics, Dnipro University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37332/

Keywords:

social projects, social policy, investment, innovation, institutional environment, international experience, countries of the world, inclusion, employment, human capital, post-war reconstruction

Abstract

Shynkaruk L.V., Prushkivska E.V., Bondarenko L.A.  SOCIAL PROJECTS AS A TOOL OF INNOVATIVE SOCIAL POLICY: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND NATIONAL CONTEXT

Purpose. The aim of the article is to determine the role of social projects as a tool for innovative social policy based on an analysis of international experience and to outline the possibilities for their adaptation to the Ukrainian context in the conditions of military and post-war transformations.

Methodology of research. The research uses a systematic approach, structural-functional analysis and a comparative method to identify patterns in the development of social projects in different regions of the world (EU, USA, Asia, Latin America). Content analysis of regulatory and legal documents, strategic programmes of international organisations (EU, UNDP, OECD, World Bank) and national acts of Ukraine was used to assess the institutional environment for the implementation of social projects. The empirical basis consisted of statistical reports, analytical reviews and practices of implementing projects in the social sphere, which made it possible to determine their effectiveness and innovative potential. The generalisation of the results makes it possible to outline strategic approaches to the formation of social policy based on social projects and their effective integration into the national system.

Findings. It has been established that social projects are a strategic tool for modernising social policy, ensuring the innovative nature of social change, institutional stability and investment in human capital. In EU countries, their implementation is based on a high level of institutionalisation and partnership with communities. In the United States, the emphasis is on the use of entrepreneurial tools, impact financing and systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of social projects. In Asian countries, models based on the integration of digital solutions and community-based approaches that ensure the active participation of local communities play a leading role. In Latin America, social projects are mainly developed within the framework of poverty reduction and inclusive development programmes aimed at reducing structural inequality. For Ukraine, social projects are of critical importance in the context of war and post-war reconstruction, as they provide support to vulnerable groups, develop social infrastructure, reintegrate veterans, stimulate entrepreneurship and attract international resources. The analysis identified three fundamental functions of social projects in contemporary development strategies, covering the investment dimension, which involves the mobilisation of financial and institutional resources; the innovation dimension, which shapes new models of social interaction; and the institutional and stabilisation dimension, which strengthens the capacity of communities and state institutions. A synthesis of these provisions gives grounds to assert that social projects should form the conceptual basis for shaping Ukraine's innovative social policy and determine its strategic guidelines in the context of transformational challenges.

Originality. The scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive integration of international and national experience of social projects within a single conceptual model that includes institutional, innovative and investment dimensions. Unlike previous studies, the proposed interpretation considers social projects not only as socially oriented measures, but as a mechanism for the systemic transformation of social policy and the formation of a new institutional environment. A typology of international regional models has been created and the prospects for their adaptation to Ukraine have been identified, taking into account military risks, demographic changes and the needs of post-war reconstruction.

Practical value. The results obtained can be used by state authorities and local self-government bodies to develop social programmes and projects aimed at supporting human capital and strengthening social inclusion. Social projects are a tool for shaping innovative social policy and modernising social services in the context of post-war reconstruction. The proposed approaches create the basis for a project-oriented model of social policy with the integration of innovation, partnership and sustainable socio-economic impact.

Key words: social projects, social policy, investment, innovation, institutional environment, international experience, countries of the world, inclusion, employment, human capital, post-war reconstruction.

References

1. Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, USA, 366 p.

2. Hemerijck, A., Ronchi, S. and Plavgo, I. (2023), “Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states”, Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 479-500, available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/entities/publication/a0aedc9d-3706-58d1-8517-cabd3276ba58 (access date June 14, 2025).

3. OECD (2020), Social Economy and the COVID-19 Crisis: Current and Future Roles, OECD Publishing, available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/social-economy-and-the-covid-19-crisis-current-and-future-roles_f904b89f-en/full-report.html (access date June 14, 2025).

4. Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (2017), “Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models”, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2469–2497, DOI: 10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7.

5. European Commission (2020), Social Enterprises and their Ecosystems in Europe. Comparative synthesis report, Authors: Carlo Borzaga, Giulia Galera, Barbara Franchini, Stefania Chiomento, Rocío Nogales and Chiara Carini, Luxembourg. Publications Office of the EU, available at: https://base.socioeco.org/docs/social_enterprises_and_their_ecosystems_in_europe._comparative_synthesis_report.pdf (access date June 14 2025).

6. Mulgan, G. (2019), Social Innovation: How Societies Find the Power to Change. Bristol University Press, England, DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvs89dd3.

7. Pylypenko, H. and Pylypenko, Yu. (2014), Socially responsible business behavior: essence and conditions of formation in Ukraine, Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho hirnychoho universytetu, no. 4 (48), pp. 28-35. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/evngu_2014_4_6 (access date June 14, 2025).

8. Ushenko, N.V., Kozhemiakina, S.M. and Tupika, A.S. (2024), “Social innovation and social responsibility: how the human factor affects sustainable city development”, Yevropeiskyi naukovyi zhurnal ekonomichnykh ta finansovykh innovatsii, vol. 2, no. 14, pp. 439-447, available at: DOI: http://doi.org/10.32750/2024-0239

9. Savchenko, V.F. and Makliuk, O.V. (2021), “Innovative approaches to the development of the social sphere of Ukraine”, Ekonomichnyi forum, no. 2, pp. 154-163, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecfor_2021_2_22 (access date June 16, 2025).

10. Bolotna, O.V. and Kostyuk, M.K. (2017), “Social innovations as the instrument of Ukrainian population quality of life upgrading”, Ekonomika i suspilstvo, iss. 10, pp. 510–517.

11. Dielini, M. and Aksentiuk, M. (2024), “Social responsibility of business under the war conditions”, Ekonomika i suspilstvo, no. 66, available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/4602 (access date June 17, 2025).

12. Borrás, S. and Edquist, C. (2019), Holistic innovation policy: Theoretical foundations, policy problems, and instrument choices. Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198809807.001.0001

13. European Commission (2024), Europe 2030 Strategy: A Union that Strives for More. Brussels : EU Publications, available at: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-04/political-guidelines-next-commission_en_0.pdf (access date July 01, 2025).

14. European Commission (2021), European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) 2021–2027: Investing in People. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/22eff113-678a-11eb-aeb5-01aa75ed71a1?utm (access date July 01, 2025).

15. White House. Social Innovation Fund, available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/ administration/eop/sicp/initiatives/social-innovation-fund?utm (access date July 04, 2025).

16. Center for American Progress. Fact Sheet: Social Impact Bonds in the United States, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fact-sheet-social-impact-bonds-in-the-united-states/ (access date July 04, 2025).

17. Alves, R.F.S. et al. (2021), Database on the coverage of the “Bolsa‑Família” conditioning cash‑transfer program: Brazil, 2005 to 2021. BMC Research Notes, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356586604_Database_on_the_coverage_of_the_Bolsa-Familia_conditioning_cashtransfer_program_Brazil_2005_to_2021 (access date July 11, 2025).

18. Ho, J.Y. and Yoon, S. (2022), “Ambiguous roles of intermediaries in social entrepreneurship: The Case of Social Innovation System in South Korea”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 175, available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162521007551?um (access date July 12, 2025).

19. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. BRIDGE Program: Social Implementation of R&D, available at: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/bridge/index.html?utm_source (access date July 18, 2025).

20. World Bank. Vietnam Inclusive Innovation Project (VIIP), available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/691701468128098878/pdf/741010PAD0P121010Box374388B00OUO090.pdf?utm_source (access date July 10, 2025)

21. PT SMI. Annual Report 2018, available at: https://www.ptsmi.co.id/cfind/source/files/annual-report/annual-report-pt-smi-2018.pdf?utm_source (access date July 10, 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

“SOCIAL PROJECTS AS A TOOL OF INNOVATIVE SOCIAL POLICY: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND NATIONAL CONTEXT”. INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 5-13, https://doi.org/10.37332/.