BENCHMARKS OF ENSURING AN «ECONOMIC BREAKTHROUGH» OF UKRAINE IN TECHNOLOGICAL AND INNOVATIVE AREAS
Abstract
Smoliar L.I., Ilyash O.I., Kolishenko R.O., Lytvak T.M. BENCHMARKS OF ENSURING AN «ECONOMIC BREAKTHROUGH» OF UKRAINE IN TECHNOLOGICAL AND INNOVATIVE AREAS
Purpose. The aim of the article is the system analysis of foreign experience and development of indicators and directions of an «economic breakthrough» in technological and innovative areas within the framework for the preparation of the Strategy of an economic breakthrough of the state by the Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine.
Methodology of research. General and special methods have been used to achieve this aim in our scientific and analytical development: the axiomatic method and scientific abstraction method (to define the terminological consistency of notions by studying the categorical apparatus «technological breakthrough», «economic breakthrough» and «innovative breakthrough”; induction and deduction methods (to determine the core factors of an economic breakthrough); the method of synthesis and system analysis (to substantiate the theoretical essence of the basic notions and develop our own system of indicators of an «economic breakthrough»; the decomposition method (to single out the functional components (technological and innovative) in the system of an «economic breakthrough»; tabular and graphical methods (to reflect the analytical calculations and the final results of the study).
Findings. The experience of 19 countries that have made an «economic breakthrough» in technological and innovative areas is systematised, in particular: the experience of the USA, Canada, Australia, Japan, China, Singapore, South Korea, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, France, Germany, Egypt, Switzerland, Great Britain, Austria, Brazil and India. The original system of indicators has been suggested and the comparative monitoring of the indicators, which helped to provide a «technological and innovative breakthrough» for the selected countries of the world in comparison with Ukraine, has been carried out. The recommendations to public authorities, aimed at creating the main benchmarks of an «economic breakthrough» of Ukraine in the technological and innovative areas of activity, have been prepared.
Originality. A system of indicators of an economic breakthrough of Ukraine in technological and innovative directions has been formed for the first time, the foreign experience of economically developed countries of the world in the direction of achieving economic growth of national economies has been systematised. The recommendations to public authorities concerning the identification of the main benchmarks for Ukraine's technological and innovative breakthrough in the near future have been further developed.
Practical value. The outlined priority directions of the policy «Economic breakthrough» and intensification of the state policy on ensuring the economic welfare and growth in Ukraine are substantiated by the applied analysis of critical technological, innovative and state-building factors of the exacerbation of economic problems in Ukraine.
Key words: economic breakthrough, benchmarks, indicators, technological area, innovative area, economic growth.
Keywords
References
World Competitiveness Ranking 2019, available at: https://www.imd.org/wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world-digital-competitiveness-rankings-2019/ (access date April 20, 2020).
Freeman, C. (1987), Technical Innovation, Diffusion, and Long Cycles of Economic Development. In: Vasko T. (ed.), The Long-Wave Debate, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 295-309.
Schwab, K. (2016), “The Forth Industrial Revolution”, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, available at: https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab (access date April 20, 2020).
Avdulov, A.N. (1992), Nauka i proizvodstvo: vek integratsii: (SShA, Zapadnaia Yevropa, Yaponiia) [Science and production: the age of integration: (USA, Western Europe, Japan)], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 168 p.
Kibitkin, A.I. and Chechurina, M.N. (2011), “A conceptual approach to the assessment of innovative development of an enterprise”, Vestnik Murmanskogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, no. 2, Volume 14, pp. 427-434.
Illiashenko, S.M. (2003), Upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom: problemy, kontseptsii, metody [Management of innovative development: problems, concepts, methods], tutorial, VTD “Universytetska knyha", Sumy, Ukraine, 278 p.
Artemenko, L.V. (2015), “Special features of the national innovation system of Ukraine in the context of economic security”, Naukovyi visnyk humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika ta menedzhment, Iss. 11, pp. 51-54.
Dubyk, V.Ya., and Osidach, O.B. (2014), “The expansion of Ukraine’s participation in the new technological paradigm as a way of an innovative breakthrough and an increase in profitability”, Innovatsiina ekonomika, no. 2, pp. 31-39.
Sharma, R. (2013), Proryvnye ekonomiki. V poiskakh sleduiushchego ekonomicheskogo chuda [Breakout Nations. In Pursuit of the Next Economic Miracles], “Mann, Ivanov and Ferber”, Moscow, Russia, 352 p.
Delbeke, J. (1985), Long-wave research: The state of the Art. In: Bianchi, G. et al. (Eds), Long Waves, Depression, and Innovation: Implications for National and Regional Economic Policy, Proc. Siena/Florence Meeting, (Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis), available at: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/2524/ (access date May 23, 2020).
Zhuplev, Anatoly V. (Ed.) (2018), Disruptive Technologies for Business Development and Strategic Advantage. IGI Global, Hershey USA, 364 p.
Armstrong, Paul (2017), Disruptive Technologies: Understand, Evaluate, Respond. Kogan Page, New Delhi, India, Philadelphia, USA, London, United Kingdom, 152 p.
“Stagnation of the project approach in the field of science as a resource for modernization and development of Ukraine”, Analytical note, available at: http://old2.niss.gov.ua/articles/1225/ (access date May 22, 2020).
Levkovska, L.V. (2009), “The formation of innovation clusters in Ukraine”, Produktyvni syly Ukrainy, no. 1, pp. 115-119.
Sokolenko, S.І. (2008), “Problems and prospects of strengthening the competitiveness of Ukraine’s economy on the basis of clusters”, Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy. Klastery ta konkurentospromozhnist prykordonnykh rehioniv: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, available at: http://ucluster.org/sokolenko/2008/06/posylennya-konkurentozdatnosti-ekonomiki-ukrajini-na-osnovi-klasteriv/ (access date May 22, 2020).
“The state policy is to promote the development of innovative clusters in the Ukrainian industry”, Analytical note, available at: https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/ekonomika/schodo-derzhavnoi-politiki-pidtrimki-rozvitku-innovaciynikh-klasteriv-u (access date May 22, 2020).
The Bloomberg Innovation Index, available at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/germany-nearly-catches-korea-as-innovation-champ-u-s-rebounds (access date January 22, 2020).
Ilyash, O. et al. (2020), “Evaluation of enterprise investment attractiveness under circumstances of economic development”, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, no. 47(47), pp. 95-113.
Vasyltsiv, T., Irtyshcheva, I., Lupak, R. et al. (2020), “Economy’s innovative technological competitiveness: Decomposition, methodic of analysis and priorities of public policy”, Management Science Letters, Vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 3173-3182.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2020.5-6.3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2006 - 2024